http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gupta_Empire#Chandra_Gupta_II
he undertook invasions into present day Iran and surrounding territories to subdue the tribes existing there who were labelled barbarians.
the followers of the sangh parivar who are labouring under the illusion that the hindus are cowards and that they have to summon courage under the unique leadership of the RSS might be astonished at this information and scratch their heads in disbelief.
"this is impossible,we were taught that the hindus are cowards,gautier also told us something else."
what these events suggest is that when a religion attains a newer and higher stage of development,the rulers and the martial classes are given the convictions to undertake military campaigns against the people who are not a part of their evolved religion.
the same campaign by chandragupta II would have been repeated in the reverse direction by the peoples of the middle east after they received islam,with the indians being the ones labelled as barbarians.
Showing posts with label the real hindutva. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the real hindutva. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Thursday, November 6, 2008
who is anti hindu
the supporters of the bjp can be seen all over the internet mouthing the accusation that hindus are cowards.
all self respecting people who consider themselves hindu should stay clear of this group of people who go around attributing cowardice to their entire group.
there should be a fact finding mission to find out which part of the so called hinduism identifies itself with this line of thinking ,
this part can then be suitably counselled.
What constitutes cowardice should actually be examined.
do groups of people who use their numbers to inflict injury on helpless people who are totally unprepared fall into this category?
The next thing that should be examined is whether man should expose himself to the thinking of other people in other parts of the world.
Those who say no should go back to the days of sati and child marriage,the days of untouchability.
The question that follows is when were the people of the south as well as the north exposed to war and what constituted war,Was it about arm wrestling or did it include bloodshed?
Who would have defined a boundary stating that we will have war with the people from upto that boundary,"any army from beyond that boundary will not be fought by us as we invoke cowardice collectively"..
Who would have defined that any religious thinking from upto that boundary will be acceptable to us,"any religious thinking even if from 100 kms across the boundary will undo our brains".
Who would have defined that certain features would separate certain people from belonging to our group of people,"they look different from us and so we think of them as opposed to us".
The next set of questions would be
What was trade and who was trading with whom?
What were people interested in,would they have shut themselves up to any news about any new thinking and any new personalities?
all self respecting people who consider themselves hindu should stay clear of this group of people who go around attributing cowardice to their entire group.
there should be a fact finding mission to find out which part of the so called hinduism identifies itself with this line of thinking ,
this part can then be suitably counselled.
What constitutes cowardice should actually be examined.
do groups of people who use their numbers to inflict injury on helpless people who are totally unprepared fall into this category?
The next thing that should be examined is whether man should expose himself to the thinking of other people in other parts of the world.
Those who say no should go back to the days of sati and child marriage,the days of untouchability.
The question that follows is when were the people of the south as well as the north exposed to war and what constituted war,Was it about arm wrestling or did it include bloodshed?
Who would have defined a boundary stating that we will have war with the people from upto that boundary,"any army from beyond that boundary will not be fought by us as we invoke cowardice collectively"..
Who would have defined that any religious thinking from upto that boundary will be acceptable to us,"any religious thinking even if from 100 kms across the boundary will undo our brains".
Who would have defined that certain features would separate certain people from belonging to our group of people,"they look different from us and so we think of them as opposed to us".
The next set of questions would be
What was trade and who was trading with whom?
What were people interested in,would they have shut themselves up to any news about any new thinking and any new personalities?
Monday, March 3, 2008
The time has come to expose the fraud of the sangh parivar
The forces of the sangh parivar have twisted everything from the past and have turned our youth into apologists of their actions.
Armies from the west have come into India from the times of Alexander and possibly earlier also.
There were monarchs like Ashoka and Chandragupta who had vast empires.
Islam came into India within a short span of its origin.
The Muslim armies would probably not have been possessed by a missionary zeal as by a materialistic ambition.
The local populations would not have unnecessarily been agitated at these invasions as their lives would have been insulated from the kings and their armies.
When some of these kings were driven to use religion in their political wars,the people fiercely resisted.
Whenever a temple was demolished in these political wars,the repercussions would have been the fiercest.
Those kings who fell into the trap of mixing religion with politics would have realised their folly and the staunch belief of the indian people in their religious philosophies.
There were a few instances when the wars were horrifyingly bloody.
Those were 500-1000 years back.
80 % of India is hindu of one form or another today.
The forces of the sangh parivar have tarnished the courage and the greatness of the indian people.
Hinduism is universal and everlasting.
The forces of the sangh parivar have degraded the youth into hating other religions.
Armies from the west have come into India from the times of Alexander and possibly earlier also.
There were monarchs like Ashoka and Chandragupta who had vast empires.
Islam came into India within a short span of its origin.
The Muslim armies would probably not have been possessed by a missionary zeal as by a materialistic ambition.
The local populations would not have unnecessarily been agitated at these invasions as their lives would have been insulated from the kings and their armies.
When some of these kings were driven to use religion in their political wars,the people fiercely resisted.
Whenever a temple was demolished in these political wars,the repercussions would have been the fiercest.
Those kings who fell into the trap of mixing religion with politics would have realised their folly and the staunch belief of the indian people in their religious philosophies.
There were a few instances when the wars were horrifyingly bloody.
Those were 500-1000 years back.
80 % of India is hindu of one form or another today.
The forces of the sangh parivar have tarnished the courage and the greatness of the indian people.
Hinduism is universal and everlasting.
The forces of the sangh parivar have degraded the youth into hating other religions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
.jpg)