Why does the United States need India to break up

The United States Of America has embarked on a mission to become a super-controller of the globe. In the middle-east, the USA  has started contriving and aiding rebellions and regime changes.

With regard to India, the USA  might be thinking along the lines of splitting the country. Instability is good for business, would be the thinking.

The strategy would be to systematically target the Indian National Congress, which is the only cohesive political formation in the country.

Bastards like Kejriwal, Bedi, Bhushan, and the electronic media are roped in for the contract, without any idea of the nature of the job they have undertaken or maybe with the idea.

A broken up India would be too good to be true for American companies, and for the government too, as it would facilitate setting up bases all over the country, and set up the launching pad for targeting the last prize on the radar of the Americans, which would be China.

Then, Russia would become the odd man out in a world strategically embraced by the USA. American software will rule the world, American finance will be all over the place, in a global structure, with headquarters in Washington.

That is the plan.

Going forward with it, the electronic media was today seen covering a fool, while parliament is in session, and the issues faced by the people are being raised and debated.

For the bastards of the electronic media, it was the fool that was important.

Employing bastards like kejriwal, bedi and bhushan might be a good strategy for the Americans, but if they think that everything can be steered according to their plans, then they are forgetting history.

Having a hint of this plan, China has been setting up its own covert operations, with the moral and possibly material support to the Maoists.

The two superpowers seem to have decided that India will be where they wage their war of wits. Pakistan has become more or less totally controlled by the Americans, while China has set roots in Sri Lanka.

Russia seems to be in an alliance with China.

The people of India, meanwhile, have no idea that they are being led to destruction and chaos, and forget that they hold the reins of a monumental democracy, one that is time immemorial, and was going well and strong, until the brahmins corrupted and wrecked the sub-continent.

the organisations of the brahmins seem to have bought into this quest of the Americans, slowly and surely shedding any political activity, and lining up behind the dummies orchestrated by the Americans.

As far as Sri Lanka goes, it seems to have been given the go-by by the Americans, as they look to break up the far-bigger prize of India, after which Sri Lanka will be a puny piece of territory, far removed from the Chinese territory, just as the East Indies were for the Japanese.

The way that the world is functioning at the present time, is that weapons and war represent the only means to bolster trade and growth.

It is not the way that the world needs to function, as can be seen in the trade relations between the Tamil land and the Roman Empire two thousand years back.

However, the present-day corporate style of business seeks to keep improving earnings and revenues, quarter after quarter, year after year.

Having become accustomed to this lifestyle, the Americans plan to keep their corporate growth story ongoing by breaking up the rest of the world into small pockets, that cannot exist without the software that has been created by the Americans.

the complexed and the contrived chinese step onto the world stage

how do they do it, by allying and colluding with a sinhala regime that thinks the world is populated by capitalist addicts of power, wealth and avarice. that might be the situation in the world where everyone is neatly behind this or that god or godman, and diseased with the lack of the alliance with nature, culture and language. the so-called liberals labour under an illusion of elitism and artificialism or atleast with a feeling of  insignificance.

a country with everything going for it, and a stable one-party structure, cannot fathom a confidence or a dignity, but behaves with a jingoism and a necessity for projecting a brute image. China is an ancient civilisation just like ours, it had bad experiences with colonialism and foreign occupation, not very unlike what we experienced. while we behave with dignity that distinguishes us for our heritage and antiquity, though we do not have any great power, the behavior of the chinese is much like a new bloke in town, a rootless wanderer, who lives just for the moment. maybe, there is something wrong within China that makes them want to collude with the land thieves of the so-called sri lanka. are the chinese so desperate to maintain their wealth that they want to ally with thieves.

one of these sinhalese ministers says that the ground realities have changed in Sri lanka. the minister is sought to be shown as an intellectual by the hindu newspaper which tells that he is a double graduate or rhodes scholar or something like that. however the spin might be imparted, this is the language of a thief who is revelling in new-found wealth and power, that the thief himself never expected would come his way. and who does the thief have as his partner, an ancient and cultural great land that had itself survived the onslaught of those that surrounded it, before having achieved a stability and a success in the last fifty years.

what does the rhodes scholar mean by "the ground realities have changed in Sri Lanka". only his chinese counterparts can attempt to explain.

http://www.hindu.com/2010/10/18/stories/2010101855181100.htm


why do the chinese need to behave as if they fear India, by going around and spreading instability in Sri Lanka, Paistan, Burma. Do the Chinese think that they are helping these countries by courting them. these countries are being lulled into folly by the interactions of the chinese. what do all the experiences of the chinese, from the long march, count for today, when they have stepped onto the home stretch. they project a complexed and contrived image. maybe, the one-party system has enormous pressures among the various individual claimants, who need the projection of the tough war-mongering image to cover up their stresses.

what the chinese communist party needs to inform its members is that the world wants them to succeed, and that they have everything going for them, and that pressures for positions are normal, and have to be acknowledged in the open. they are also humans, and not some robotic extra terrestrials. an openness of the party will only be possible with the confidence that their system is unique but will have shortcomings, but the greatest treasure that they hold is their culture and civilisation. they should not be helping land thieves and helping annihilate cultures. the cia and the american warlords of capitalism have revealed that every country can succeed only if it caters to its people, with the facilities at hand and available.

china

there has been unease amongst us as many reports have come in about chinas aggressive actions.
the unease must be primarily due to the feeling that china is stronger than us.
this could be an opportunity to realise that the pakistanis might have been living with the same similar feeling since independence.
part of the reason for our unease stems from the knowledge that we could not handle china in 1962.
the same feeling will be shared by the pakistanis with regard to us.
it also affords us an opportunity to consider our thoughts towards pakistan and arrive at an understanding of the way the chinese people might be viewing us in their minds.
just as we think of the irresponsible pakistanis and their acts in kashmiris,the chinese might be thinking of our irresponsible actions with regard to tibet.
the actual problems and their possible resolutions are another thing.
the electronic media has to realise that it is not helping the people by bold headlines like the one today about our disgraced cricket team.it was a foolish headline,seen on times now.

chinese opinion

http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90777/90851/6676088.html

the comments on the article are here:

http://posts.people.com.cn/bbs_new/filepool/htdoc/html/fa55b84865e12e8cfed39984b53db6282017122b/b3594639/l_3594639_1.html

and here:

http://posts.people.com.cn/bbs_new/filepool/htdoc/html/ef127590cf4c20f491fec831d50c3e5266bccc2c/b3653063/l_3653063_1.html


the sri lankan and eelam issues are discussed here,i found this on the same site.
http://posts.people.com.cn/bbs_new/filepool/htdoc/html/d932506d2b21fba0cb07ac9a97bff54a22dd9672/b3573812/l_3573812_1.html

China

G parthasarathy says new delhi cravenly behaved in putting down the protests during the olympic torch run.

http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnist1.asp?main_variable=Columnist&file_name=parthasarathy%2Fparthasarathy182%2Etxt&writer=parthasarathy